2.Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

From the early April 2013, the Defendant, in D and E located in Busan Shipping Daegu C on April 2013, had his customers using the resident registration record card by altering the certified copy of the registration record card as if he had a director who had subscribed to the existing c matters, while soliciting Internet telephone subscribers, had the people who had subscribed to the cream before the cream, and had the people exempted from penalty to pay the cream prior to the cream, while allowing them to use the cream as if he had the director who had not provided the cream service.

1. On May 6, 2013, the Defendant altered official document: (a) recruited F as a new subscriber; (b) converted F’s certified copy of a resident registration record card issued from F to a computer glickner into a file; (c) converted F into a file; and (d) inserted it into the present address column “Seoul Metropolitan City g 102 Dong-gu 302, May 6, 2013,” and printed it from that time.

7.2. During the period of up to 2.0, 4 copies of the resident registration cards against F and H, etc. whose address is changed as described in the annexed List of Crimes (1) were printed.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant changed one copy of the resident registration record card against F under the name of the head of the Busan Metropolitan City International Transportation Daegu Dong, one copy of the resident registration record card against H under the name of the head of the Busan Metropolitan City Maritime Transportation Daegu Dong, one copy of the resident registration record card against L under the name of the head of the Busan Metropolitan City Gun, one copy of the resident registration record card against K-Gun in Busan Metropolitan City, and one copy of the

2. On May 11, 2013, the Defendant at the same place as above 1, 2013, sent a certified copy of the resident registration card of the above F, which was modified by facsimile, to employees under the name default of the call center from that time, as if the certified copy of the resident registration card of the above F, was actually issued by facsimile, and from that time, the Defendant sent it to employees under the name default

7. During the period of May, 200, the resident registration card altered as above, as shown in the List of Offenses (2).