2. The Defendants did not pay the above fine.

around 19:00 on October 20, 2013, on the ground that the victim F was assaulted by the victim F in the Roter at the Erater located in Sejong-si D, Defendant A committed assault by the victim, and Defendant B, and Defendant B followed the victim, leading the victim out of the Eravis, leading the victim out of the Eravis bank, and Defendant A got the victim out of the victim, and then Defendant A, Defendant A, G, and Defendant B got the victim out of the Eravis bank, and met the victim's face by drinking.

As a result, Defendants and G jointly put up on the victim F the right side eyebrow in need of approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness F and H (which each statement is judged to be reliable in that it is consistent and consistent with the injury diagnosis and photograph);

1. A criminal explanatory note (if the police is called out, it is deemed that the Defendants were about to go to F or H);

1. Attachment of photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate (F);

1. Relevant Article 2 (2) and (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the defendants who choose to commit a crime;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act