However, the defendant does not respond to the report and has been dispatched at around 15:00 on the same day, and he/she sits and sits at the same place until the police officer arrives, and he/she leaves the victim's place without justifiable grounds.

The Gu refused to comply with the Gu.

2. The Defendant consistently and consistently from the police to this court, and the Defendant is required to leave the victim.

In other words, even if the Gu did not immediately respond, the defendant's act is excluded from illegality as a legitimate act that does not violate social norms by demanding repayment as a creditor.

Therefore, according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, ① the Defendant received the claim amounting to KRW 74,495,985 from E on March 5, 2007 from E to the victim, ② the Defendant was in contact with or was unable to contact with the victim by the date of the instant case following the acquisition of the above claim, ③ the Defendant was in contact with the victim by the date of the instant case, ③ was in contact with the name of the company operated by the victim, and was aware of the address of the company through the Internet portal site search, ④ was in contact with the victim at around 14:20 on the day of the instant case, ④ was in contact with the employee at the entrance of the office, ④ was in contact with the victim’s office, ④ was in contact with the employee, ⑤ was in contact with the victim at the entrance of the office, ⑤ was demanding the Defendant to have continued to pay the debt at any time, and was in contact with the victim, and did not have any desire or assault, etc.