When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On March 30, 2016, at the front of the 'D convenience store' in the Won-si, Seoul Special Metropolitan City around 17:45, the Defendant stated that, in the front of the 'D convenience store' of the 112 taxi engineer, who was dispatched after being reported by the 112 taxi engineer and the Defendant, the scambling F belonging to the Ku-gu Police Station E-gu, the Defendant tried to listen to the situation of the cab engineer’s vision from the Defendant, and that, “I ambling the cab engineer, I ambling, I ambling, I want to ambling, I ambling, I want to do so.”

“In doing so, I am at one time at the floor of the said F with the face of the said F.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of police officers' crimes, and reporting processing 112.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the law of the police statement protocol to F;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 136 of the choice of punishment: Selection of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;