A. As to Defendant B and D Co., Ltd.: KRW 30,000,000 and KRW 20,000,100 among them, respectively.

A. Before January 1, 2011, the Plaintiff entered into an agreement with Defendant B and the insured with the content of a group insurance contract that contains the Plaintiff, the insurance period of the Plaintiff for one year in 2011, “the occurrence of a high-level disability with at least 80%,” “risk of disability with less than 80%”, “risk of disability with less than 80%”, “the occurrence of a high-level disability with at least 24 hours for 1 year in 2011,” “the occurrence of a high-level disability with at least 24 hours”, “risk of a high-level disability with less than 80% in 24 hours”, “the risk of a high-level disability with less than 80% in 24 hours”, “the Plaintiff and the insured”, “the insurance period of the Plaintiff and the insured” on December 31, 2011,” “the guarantee of substitution of an insurance proceeds for the post facto disability (Death)”, etc.

B. According to the terms and conditions of the Defendants, if the rate of payment specified in the disability classification table is at least 80% due to an injury during the insurance period, the total amount of insurance coverage amount of KRW 30 million (Provided, That Defendant C is KRW 40 million) shall be the insurance amount, and if the payment rate becomes a disability equivalent to less than 80%, the amount calculated by multiplying the insurance coverage amount by KRW 30 million (Provided, That Defendant C is 40 million) shall be paid as the insurance amount.

C. On December 6, 2011, in order to attend the workshop held by the Statistics Korea, the Plaintiff was an accident where the vehicle was transferred to another person due to the collision of divers on the road before the Irves located in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, while driving a car owned by the Plaintiff from the 20:10 on December 6, 201 to a public official of the Gu-U.S. G. (hereinafter “instant accident”).

After the accident of this case, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as brain transfusion and the left-hand horse.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 7, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 7, 8, Eul evidence No. 1 (including provisional number, hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the instant accident interferes with the Plaintiff’s new boundary.