However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a K5-car.

On June 28, 2017, the Defendant driven the above car at around 15:17, and proceeded at the speed from the shooting distance of the hospital located in the north-gu C at the port of port at the second two lanes of the D, which is located in the north-gu C at the port of port, to the ebbbbrence of the ebbrence and became a U-turn.

Since there are frequent traffic of pedestrians around the market, the defendant had a duty of care to prevent accidents by safely making a U-turn in accordance with the new subparagraph at the point where U-turn permission is granted by reducing speed and by properly examining the right and the right and the right of the defendant.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and hereded the central line at a point where the U.S. could not make a U.S., and received the victim E, who was unauthorized, from the outside of the Madern market, without permission, due to the negligence of the U.S., the victim E was the front part of the vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as the cutting of a felbs, in the middle of 12 weeks of medical treatment, due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A report on a traffic accident, a survey report, and photographs at the scene of the accident;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (2) 2 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act concerning community service and order to attend lectures;