beta
(영문) 서울행정법원 2017.02.23 2016구합58741

정보공개거부처분취소

Text

1. The Defendant’s decision to disclose information to the Plaintiff on March 11, 2016 is revoked.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On March 9, 2016, the Plaintiff disclosed the following information to the Defendant (hereinafter “instant information”) and entered into a contract on around 2014, with a view to disclosing the following information: (a) material cost, labor cost, and cost of each of the following seven places of business; and (b) the cost of materials, labor cost, and cost of each of the following seven places of business to be disclosed to the EX.

1. Construction works from the port of the East Sea Line to the port of the East Sea Line, and from the construction works of the six sections for railway construction;

2. Construction works from the port of the East Sea Line to the 7th main railway construction works.

3. Construction works from the port of the East Sea Line to the 8th main railway construction works.

4. Construction works from the port of the East Sea to the port of port of the East Sea, and from the 9th main railway construction works.

5. Construction works from the port of the East Sea Line to the 10th main railway construction works.

6. Construction of railway 11 tools from the port of the East Sea Line to the port of the East Sea Line.

7. A claim was made for the construction of sections 12 of the East Sea Line from the East Sea Port to the East Sea Line.

B. On March 11, 2016, the Defendant rendered a decision not to disclose the instant information on the ground that the instant information constitutes information subject to non-disclosure under Article 9(1)5 of the Official Information Disclosure Act (hereinafter “Information Disclosure Act”) and Article 3(5)2 of the Defendant’s detailed guidelines for information subject to non-disclosure.

(hereinafter “Disposition in this case”). / [Grounds for recognition] without dispute, entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant lawsuit is lawful or not, the Defendant asserted to the effect that the information sought by the Plaintiff is not owned in addition to the materials already disclosed regarding the construction of the East Sea Line from the Port of the East Sea to the Port of the East Sea Line 6 to the 12th Sections Construction. Accordingly, this paper

The purpose of a lawsuit seeking revocation of a disposition rejecting the disclosure of information is to obtain the information by revoking the disposition of refusal of the public institution on the premise that the public institution retains and manages the information, so there is no legal interest to seek revocation of the disposition of refusal of the disclosure of information.