자동차운전면허취소처분취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Details of disposition;
A. On December 7, 1998, the Plaintiff acquired a driver’s license (Class 1 ordinary) and acquired a driver’s license on March 15, 200 (Class 1 large).
B. On November 19, 2018, the Plaintiff: (a) driven at the entrance of the two-lane 122 at the two-lanes, two-way, two-way, two-way, two-way, two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the one-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the one-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the one-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the vehicle (hereinafter “the instant accident”). (b) the driver of the affected vehicle (hereinafter “victims”) submitted a diagnosis report on salt cats, etc. requiring a congested treatment for about two weeks, and submitted an estimate of the repair cost to KRW 1,250,360,276(b).
(c)
On December 31, 2018, the Defendant revoked all of the Plaintiff’s driver’s licenses on the ground that he/she did not take relief measures or report despite causing the instant accident (hereinafter “instant disposition”). D.
On January 17, 2019, the Plaintiff dissatisfied with the instant disposition and filed a request for administrative adjudication with the Central Administrative Appeals Commission.
3. The Plaintiff was dismissed on May 5, 200 (the delivery on March 21). E. Meanwhile, with respect to the instant accident, the Plaintiff was charged with the District Court 2019 order 1388 order, and was sentenced to the same purport as below on November 27, 2019, and both the Plaintiff and the Prosecutor appealed, but all appeals were dismissed on December 9, 2020 (which became final and conclusive). The Plaintiff breached his duty of care and did not immediately stop the instant accident to cause damage to KRW 1,52,078 and did not take necessary measures, such as aiding the damaged person.
Although the Plaintiff asserted that he left the site without recognizing the occurrence of the instant accident, it was aware of the occurrence of the accident in light of all circumstances.
shall be deemed to be.