When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

피고인은 2018. 6. 13. 경 대구 광역시 동구 B에서 잔류 농약인 클로로 피리 포스가 그 허용기준 (0.05mg /kg ) 을 초과한 0.4mg /kg 인 깻잎 5 박스를 서울시 농수산식품공사의 성명 불상 담당 직원에게 판매하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. Official announcementss and the details of inappropriate agricultural products;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs;

1. Article 95 of the relevant Act and Articles 95 subparagraph 1 and 7 (4) of the Food Sanitation Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the Suspension of Execution (Considering the following: (1) of the Criminal Act (the fact that the defendant is the first offender and appears to be the criminal defendant due to flood, the quantity and value of the relevant agricultural product in excess of the residual agricultural product is small amount and small amount, and the fact that the defendant has