However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Around 23:00 on April 4, 2012, the Defendant: (a) stated that the Victim E (the 46-year-old) who performed drinking together did not pay the Defendant to dispose of the Defendant’s vehicle or did not borrow money by taking the Defendant’s vehicle as security; (b) made a re-money demand by the Defendant, the Defendant: (c) placed the victim’s head at one time due to an empty (the dangerous object in the bend place); and (d) placed the victim’s head at one time due to a new main of the dangerous object, the victim’s head at one time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The crime of this case is serious since the crime of this case was committed by a major illness, which is a dangerous object, under Article 62-2(1) and the main sentence of Article 62-2(2) of the Criminal Act, and Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc. [The reason for the punishment]. However, the defendant's punishment was determined as ordered by taking into account the following factors: some of the factors to be considered in the circumstance; the victim's medical expenses are deemed to have been paid; and all other factors of sentencing against the defendant.