All appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

A. The sentence of the lower court (one hundred months of imprisonment, etc.) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence is too uneased and unreasonable.

2. The lower court’s sentence against the Defendant is reasonable in full view of all the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case, including the Defendant’s age, sex, family relationship, and circumstances after the crime.

All the arguments of the defendant and the prosecutor are without merit.

The favorable circumstances: The fact that the defendant recognized the crime and reflects the crime, and that there is no record of punishment for the same kind of crime: Narcotics-related crimes require strict countermeasures as a crime that causes the degradation of individuals, families, and society as a whole, the amount of the penphone purchased by the defendant is considerably large, and the training reaction is confirmed as a result of the defendant's maternity appraisal.

3. The appeal filed by the Defendant and the prosecutor in conclusion is groundless, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.