폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등재물손괴등)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. Around 00:05 on February 28, 2013, the Defendant destroyed a 100,000 won of the market price owned by the victim, who was posted two times a erobbbbbbbbbbb and a erode in the first floor area of the victim C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “C”) located in Ansan-si, Ansan-si (hereinafter “C”) and was obstructed by telephone communications. As the victim was obstructed, the Defendant destroyed a erogbbb and a erogbb and a erogb and a erogbb and a erogb and a erogbb and a erogbb and a erogbb and a
In this respect, the defendant carried a dangerous object, and damaged the victim's property.
2. Around 00:05 on February 28, 2013, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (collectively weapons, etc.) brought D’s bruptive telephone conversationss in the first floor of the underground floor of the 1st century located in Ansan-si, Ansan-si, and thereby threatening the victim with sound “C’s arms and lockeds,” and thereby threatening the victim by taking two times the brue brus of the brue, which is an object dangerous in the warehouse, due to a defect in telephone communications within the first floor of the 1st floor of the above C, Ansan-si.
In this respect, the defendant carried a dangerous object, and threatened the victim.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Application of each police protocol of statement to D and E;
1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime concerned, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act (a threat to carry dangerous articles);
1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;
1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Da1548, Jan. 1, 201);
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Discretionary Reasons for Discretionary mitigation);