2. Additional or modified parts

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion is to add the following “a summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion” to the fourth and fifth instances of the judgment of the first instance court.

around 18:10 on May 28, 2014, the Defendant: “Around 18:10, the Defendant entered the intersection of the private distance in the school 652-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, into the three-lane road in the front part of the Otoba (C) on which he was driving, and caused an accident that shocks the rear part of the Plaintiff’s vehicle (D) that was driving prior to the said three-lane. The Plaintiff caused the said traffic accident by the Defendant, resulting in the same property and mental damage as indicated in the attached Form “the details of the damage,” and thus, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff damages amounting to KRW 9,00,000 and damages for delay.”

B. On the second sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance, the court below’s decision on the medical expenses for the first instance is amended as follows: “(=76,600 won x 0.6)” in the second sentence of the judgment of the court of second instance.

“The Plaintiff suffered injuries due to the above traffic accident and received pain treatment as shown in Nos. 2 through 5, the Defendant asserts that the Plaintiff is liable for compensating the Plaintiff for damages equivalent to the medical expenses. According to each of the evidence Nos. 4 through 7, the fact that the Plaintiff received pain treatment, such as the Nos. 2 through 5, is recognized. However, according to the above evidences and evidence Nos. 1 through 3, and Nos. 1 through 1, and all of the arguments, the specific developments leading up to the occurrence of the above traffic accident (in particular, it is a vehicle accident, the degree of shock caused by the Plaintiff’s vehicle and the Plaintiff’s seat, the degree of shock caused by the Plaintiff’s vehicle, and the Plaintiff’s seat, and the shock is the back criminal.