도박
Defendant
A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 1,500,000, and Defendant B by a fine of KRW 500,000.
The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.
Punishment of the crime
1. The Defendant committed the crime of Defendant A, together with three persons, such as Sung-sung C and Sung-sung D, from around 17:10 on February 7, 2014 to around 22:05 on the same day, committed the crime of Defendant A, from around 17:10 to around 22:05, a person who first takes three points by using the 48 satis with an amount equivalent to KRW 200,00,000, respectively, and the person who took three points by paying KRW 3,000 on three points to the tension.
2. Defendant B committed the crime of gambling at the above date, time, and place, even though being aware that the above A, etc. had been gambling in the above manner, the Defendant, in this case, committed the act of gambling by dividing the money received from the winner into half of the above A, and, in the case of a plaque, committed an act of gambling by one half of the amount to be paid to the winner (the so-called “definite plaque”), and aided and aided the above A’s gambling by paying 150,000 won to the winner by half of the amount to be paid to the winner (the so-called “definite plaque”).
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol regarding F;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Attachment of Gambling Books);
1. Article applicable to criminal facts;
A. Defendant A: Article 246(1) of the Criminal Act
B. Defendant B: Articles 246(1) and 32(1) of the Criminal Act
1. Defendant B of statutory mitigation: Articles 32 (2) and 55 (1) 6 (Accessories) of the Criminal Act;
1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse;
1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, each of the provisional payment orders;