However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

The defendant, who is engaged in the real estate sales business, was aware of the victim B (the age of 46) by introducing an officetel to purchase the officetel around the beginning of 2017.

The Defendant, around June 27, 2017, at the office of sales in office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of

However, in fact, the Defendant demanded the victim to return his/her debt in return for his/her personal consumption of the money received as the down payment from the above H and his/her wife F, and the Defendant did not have any other income or property and intended to consume the money with the sale commission even if he/she did not have any money with a bad credit standing. The Defendant intended to consume the money with the purchase commission for the previous wife, his/her living expenses and gambling funds, etc. Even if the said two officetel sales contracts were to be paid by the victim, there was no thought to offer the said two officetel sales contracts as a real security, such as preparing a separate contract, even if the principal was paid by the victim on behalf of the victim, so even if the victim did not have any intention or ability to pay the above KRW 28.64 million and KRW 4 million as if the victim promised to pay the down payment of the above officetel in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, had the victim transfer 1,680,000 won of the down payment 1,000,000 won and the down payment 1,196,00 won in the name of trust company I, a trust company.

This is the defendant.