However, the defendant B is above two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

【Defendant A was sentenced to four years of imprisonment for fraud at the Suwon District Court on July 13, 2010, and the execution of the sentence was terminated on December 27, 2013. On February 18, 2016, the Daejeon District Court sentenced three years of imprisonment for fraud, etc., and the said judgment became final and conclusive on October 13, 2016. On June 17, 2016, the Daejeon District Court sentenced Defendant A to ten months of imprisonment for fraud, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on September 1, 2016.

【Defendant of the crime” in Kafa, on June 13, 2015, in which it is impossible to find out the trade name in 17:00 on the 17:00 on the 13th day of 2015, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim D that “F on behalf of the president of the E farming association corporation, purchases 1.8 billion won in total of 1.8 billion won in Cheongi-si G, H 4,630 on behalf of the president of the E farming association corporation, and down payment 200 million won in advance is a notarized contract, and the F will be directly paid by himself.”

Then, Defendant A said, “I, upon receipt of down payment, do not know about whether I would allow the amusement room to operate the amusement room at one time, and if I see the amusement machine as soon as possible, I first send the money to the machine businessman. If I would like to do so, I would first send the money to B. I would like to say “I would pay the money later than I would pay the money in lieu of the money at present. I would like to instruct B, and Defendant B would return to the Kaf, “I would return the Kaf, I will return the money to the Kaf,” and Defendant B would return to the Kaf, and “I remitted the money of KRW 20 million to the victim.”

However, in fact, it was intended to acquire money from the damaged party to use it for the repayment of personal debt by acquiring money from the damaged party, and did not transfer money from the damaged party to the mechanical operator in lieu of money.

Nevertheless, the Defendants conspired to induce the victim, and 23:45 on the same day from the victim.