beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.02.08 2016고단6107

재물손괴등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

『2016 고단 6107』 피고인은 2016. 9. 21. 02:55 경 부산 수영구 C에 있는 피해자 D( 여, 50세) 가 운영하는 E 주점 앞 도로에서 피고인이 피해자에게 맡겨 뒀던 돈을 돌려주지 않는다는 이유로 화가 나 시가 불상의 위 주점 유리창( 가로 120cm, 세로 120cm) 을 발로 차 손괴하였다.

On October 7, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 05:25, 2008, at around 05:25, the Defendant: (b) went to the “E main store operated by the Defendant D, who is a citizen of the Defendant in Suwon-gu, Busan; (c) and (d) went to the Defendant’s cell phone after drinking alcohol at the aforementioned main office; (c) but, in order to enter the main office through the back of the said main office, D did not open the door of the said main office; and (d) went to the dwelling of the said victim F (n, 62 years of age) located in the same building as the said main office and attached to the back of the main office; and (d) went to the said victim’s residence beyond the main office and intrudes the said victim’s residence.

Summary of Evidence

"2016 Highest 6107"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Investigation report (No. 1 list of evidence) 2016 high group 7008;

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes of the investigative report (No. 1 list of evidence);

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Selection of each selective fine for punishment (the victim D of the crime of destroying property is currently living together, and the victim wants to take the front line against the defendant, and in the crime of intrusion upon residence, the victim F, who was connected with the window after the main point leased by the above D, was able to find the cell phone located at the main point, but the front door was locked, and the front door was the victim's deposit money for the victim F.