If the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On March 18, 2013, at around 11:30 on March 18, 2013, the Defendants conspiredd to put the victim C, a manager, into a scam room located in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, by taking advantage of the gap where the surveillance of the victim C, a manager, was neglected. Defendant A, a man’s cloaking room displayed in the 1st floor clothing retail shop, and one cloaking room (67,900 won at each market price) located in Defendant B, and Defendant B, a theft by citing two bagss that were stolen.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Application of the police protocol law to C

1. Defendants of relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Articles 329 and 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Defendant A does not have any criminal punishment more than a fine for the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act; Defendant B does not have any criminal punishment; Defendant B does not have any criminal punishment; Defendants appears to have committed the instant crime contingently; the damage was fully recovered; and a mistake is pened, etc. shall be determined as per the order.