However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 22, 2016, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender due to the violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act from police officers E belonging to the police station in the Dong-gu Police Station in Gwangju-dong, Gwangju-gu, upon receiving a report of a disturbance of drinking on the front of the roads of Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-gu, and called for a disturbance of drinking.

The Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, committed assault, such as making a breath while drinking and driving the chest part of the above police officer twice.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of a flagrant offender by a police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the protocol concerning the interrogation of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement of a protocol concerning the examination of suspect of a police officer who has suffered damage;

1. To enter the notice of disposition in a copy of the notice of disposition and the list of reported cases in 112; and

1. Application of each of the visual Acts and subordinate statutes to each photograph;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The nature of the crime is very poor in terms of supporting the chest of the police officer who properly executes official duties for the reason of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Execution.

However, the defendant is old and has been sentenced to a fine before about 40 years.

In addition, the sentencing conditions shown in the records, such as the defendant's age, occupation, family relationship, and circumstances before and after the crime, shall be determined as ordered.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.