However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant, from around 00:01 on November 9, 2016 to 00:21 on the same day, at the “D” restaurant working for the victim C in the 1st floor B in Bupyeong-si, Busan and from around 00:21 on the same day, on the ground that the ordered food was delayed, and on the ground that the above Defendant, an employee, “Death and discarded.”

“Along with the fact that the instant instant instant instant instant instant instant instant instant instant instant instant instant table, the instant instant instant instant instant instant instant table was laid down, and the instant instant table and the water reservoir were laid down to the bottom, and the instant instant boxes were laid down to the bottom, and the instant instant table was attempted to keep the victim from entering the relevant restaurant, thereby obstructing the victim’s restaurant business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. E statements;

1. Application of on-site photographs and CCTV analysis photographs statutes;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 62 (1)