(The contents of a new contract include a number of contents unfavorable to the Plaintiff compared to the existing contract, such as the termination of the contract upon the expiration of the contract period, the contract is automatically terminated, the contract is applied only to the lot duty-free shop, and the Plaintiff’s monthly sales set up and submitted to the Defendant, etc.). On July 31, 2014, the Plaintiff provided that the instant contract was automatically renewed pursuant to Article 10, and the Plaintiff responded that there was no reason and duty to comply with the Defendant’s

H. From August 11, 2014, the Defendant, on July 31, 2014, planned to increase the supply unit price for the main products of D Cosmetics as follows. If an agreement on the supply unit price increase is not reached by August 8, 2014, the supply of goods to the Plaintiff may be suspended, and the instant contract may be terminated.

* The current unit price increase unit price for each product (Mask supply price) product description G 600 won G 840 won H 600 won Ha 840 won 8600 won J 840 won 860 won K 500 won 560 won L 560 won M 560 won 560 won - 560 won O 1,000 won 1,400 won P 1,400 won 1,500 won Q 1,500 won - 2,800 won - 2,800 won - 4,500 won -

I. From July 31, 2014 to September 1, 2014, the Plaintiff demanded the Defendant to send a multiple official document and normalize the supply of the quantity.

In addition, on August 4, 2014, the Plaintiff sent to the Defendant an official document stating that “The product is supplied at the price agreed upon under the instant contract, but the Defendant’s unilateral unit price discount is unfair, and thus, the explanation is different.”

As to this, the Defendant considers that the Plaintiff did not accept the increase in the supply price of the product by August 4, 2014, and would no longer intend to maintain the contract and take follow-up measures. The Defendant’s letter of public notice and the product price on August 6, 2014.