However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. A special intimidation: (a) around November 11, 2018, the Defendant: (b) committed an act that deemed the victim to take a large interest under the influence of alcohol on the part of the victim C (Nam, 58 years of age) in the Simsan-si B market of Changwon-si; (c) and (d) expressed that “the victim would escape from disturbance.” on the ground that the victim said that “the victim would go against disturbance.” (e.g., a dangerous object stored in a wooden box in the E-cafeteria, which is adjacent to the said box, would threaten the victim; (d) by taking a dangerous object that had been in danger; and (e) by taking two sculpies, a dangerous object that had been in the said market, and thereby threatening the victim, as it would inflict any harm on the body, etc. of the victim.

2. On November 13, 2018, from around 10:20 to 10:50, the Defendant: (a) was under the influence of alcohol in G cafeteria operated by the Victim F in Changwon-si, Changwon-si B; and (b) without any justifiable reason, the Defendant: (c) took a bath for the victim to “clocks, rings, and salbling down,” and (d) continued to sit up two to the above cafeteria table on the above cafeteria table, and (c) continued to put the disturbance on the cafeteria table, thereby preventing the customers of the said cafeteria from having access to the cafeteria; and (d) obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force.

3. In the time and place specified in Paragraph 2, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim by publicly insulting the victim by referring approximately 20 merchants in the restaurant and B market, as the police officer, who was a police officer in charge of the business of the restaurant at the 112 report while interfering with the business of the restaurant at the time and place specified in the above paragraph 2, as the victim guards belonging to the Masan-dong Police Station H District of the Masan-dong Police Station, a police officer called the Defendant for returning home to the Defendant. In compliance with approximately 20 merchants in the restaurant and B market, the Defendant: (a) Mescopia was frien; (b) Mespon was fried; (c) Ma

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement;

1. A complaint and a written statement of the I;

1. Application of C’s written laws and regulations

1. Article 284 of the Criminal Act in relation to the crime