On October 6, 2011, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 10:20 on October 6, 201, and proceeded with the intersection in front of the Jinyang shopping in the Northern-dong, Busan.

At the time of the intersection where a signal is installed, the signal was in a state of red signal with the signal apparatus. In such a case, there was a duty of care to safely stop to a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle until the signal is transmitted to the signal apparatus.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and took part of the victim E-driving FK5 car’s left turn to the left from the air of the Gunam Elementary School due to occupational negligence in the course of the operation in violation of the signal, and received the front part of the above rocketing car as the front part of the above rocketing car.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as fluoral salt, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, due to such occupational negligence.

2. In a judgment of conviction in a criminal trial, the conviction shall be based on evidence of probative value that leads a judge to the conviction that the facts charged are true beyond a reasonable doubt.

In this case, the defendant asserts that he had entered the normal signal at the time of the accident from the investigative agency to the time of this court that he did not violate the signal, and there is a statement in E and G this court and the investigative agency that seems consistent with the above facts charged.

At the time of the accident, E is a white vehicle on the side of the old-west Elementary School at the time of the accident and the left turn to the left in accordance with the new code. At the time of the accident, E has a white vehicle on the side of the old-west School at the time of the left turn, and the vehicle behind it.