Around 14:00 on September 27, 201, the Defendant: (a) sold KRW 1,400 per kilogramggg on the part of the victim E-owned by the victim E, who purchased KRW 67,108,00 from D Co., Ltd.; and (b) embezzled by selling KRW 1,400 on the part of the victim E-owned by the victim E; and (c) kept for the victim E upon a consignment request from the victim E; (d) on October 12, 201, the Defendant arbitrarily sold and embezzled G from the mutual inf in SinsiF to KRW 200 per km against the intent of the consignment consignment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E and H;

1. A copy of a certificate;

1. A copy of written confirmation of transactions;

1. Application of the statutes governing copies of tax invoices;

1. Despite the fact that the pertinent Article of the Criminal Act and Article 355(1) of the Criminal Act regarding the crime of this case’s punishment are not considerable amount due to the crime of this case, the Defendant continued to deny the crime of this case, and did not endeavor to recover damage to the victim. Thus, the Defendant cannot be sentenced to punishment corresponding to the nature of the crime and the circumstances of the crime.

However, the defendant is sentenced to the same punishment as the order in consideration of the absence of the same criminal record.