성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
The imprisonment with prison labor for the accused shall be determined by one year and two months.
However, the above sentence shall be executed for three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant is a business owner of “D” located in Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoul (hereinafter referred to as “D”). On October 12, 2015, the Defendant stated that he/she is a business owner of the instant establishment under his/her name and that he/she is a business owner of the instant establishment if he/she concludes a lease agreement and regulates it in the future.
From January 5, 2015 to October 11, 2015, the Defendant conspired with the Defendant and E, and employed female employees, such as F, at the principal place of business from October 12, 2015 to January 20, 14, 2016, and then paid 100,000 won to female employees, and paid 50,000 won among them to female employees, and had female employees have sexual intercourse with customers.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol of F, E, or G;
1. The police statement of H;
1. Suppression photographs;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on a real estate lease contract;
1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. for the crimes and the choice of punishment (Article 30 of the Criminal Act), the choice of imprisonment;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;
1. Probation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;
1. Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic [The fact that criminal proceeds have been deposited in the national bank account (number I) in the name of the defendant, is also recognized by the defendant himself, and the accomplice E also stated that the defendant and the defense counsel also deposited part of the money or employee's benefits (one kind of expense) repaid to the J, etc. in addition to the criminal proceeds from the crime of this case. However, although the defendant and the defense counsel asserted that this part should be excluded from the subject of additional collection, the evidence submitted by the defendant alone is insufficient to acknowledge it and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.] The reason for sentencing is that the punishment
1. The sentencing criteria;