If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Around 03:00 on September 24, 2020, the Defendant used D personal taxi operated by C in front of the Southern-gu Seoul metropolitan area, and caused the time limit for taxi charges. The Defendant stated that F of the 1st 331 staff of the E box called the Defendant to pay for the taxi expenses and return home to the Defendant on the ground that F of the 331 staff of the E box called the Defendant to pay for the taxi expenses and return home. On the other hand, the Defendant interfered with F’s legitimate performance of duties by the police officer for the mobilization of the f’s cab, such as the part on the right hand hand hand hand hand of the Defendant, which was built on the road, and the f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report the arrest of a victim;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is against the defendant, and the relevant police officer and the defendant do not want the punishment against the defendant, and the degree of assault against the police officer at the time is relatively limited. In addition, the conditions of sentencing under Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive for committing the crime, and circumstances after committing the crime, etc., which are revealed in the pleading of this case, shall be comprehensively considered and determined as the order.