2. The judgment of the court below is in favor of the defendant, such as the confession of the crime of this case and the fact that there is no record of criminal punishment heavier than a suspended sentence. However, the crime of this case was committed in favor of the defendant's deception that the defendant would allow the victim to obtain more loans from the victim introduced by the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of this case.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

[However, pursuant to Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, the lower judgment ex officio is corrected as follows: (a) that the lower court’s 5th “round July 28, 2014” is deemed to be the first policeman on July 2014.”