When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On January 9, 2012, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 3,000,000 as a fine for a violation of road traffic law at the Seoul Southern District Court, and a summary order of KRW 4,000,000 as a fine for the same crime in Incheon Deputy Support on August 26, 2013.

On February 27, 2017, the Defendant driven a B option vehicle under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.122% in blood at around 23:25 on February 27, 2017, even though he had a history of driving alcohol more than twice as above, and proceeded with approximately 1 km from the front side of the Bupyeong-gu, Busan Bupyeong-gu, which is located in the Bupyeong-gu, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, Busan, to the front road of the Samsan-dong, the same day.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Previous conviction: The results of inquiry, a copy of summary order, and the application of the Acts and subordinate statutes attached thereto;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, even though the Defendant had the criminal records of the same kind of crime, is under the influence of driving a vehicle under the influence of alcohol, and the nature of the crime is not less than that of the instant crime. However, the Defendant’s punishment is determined by taking into account all the circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, occupation, environment, family relationship, etc., and the Defendant’s age, sex, occupation, family relationship, etc., which are the condition for sentencing.