공유물분할
1. The plaintiff's action against I shall be dismissed.
2. At the same time, 8,044 square meters of PP land in the East Sea and 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8.
The Plaintiff also sought a partition of the instant land against Defendant I on the premise that Defendant I is the co-owner of 8,044 square meters of PP land in the East Sea (hereinafter “instant land”). However, according to the purport of the entire pleadings, Defendant I may recognize the fact that he renounced inheritance of network R, which owns 6391/25/25 of the instant land, and thus, Defendant I’s lawsuit against Defendant I is unlawful on the ground that it did not meet the qualification as a party.
Meanwhile, comprehensively taking account of the purport of Gap evidence No. 1 and all pleadings, 804/25/25785 of the land of this case can be acknowledged that the plaintiff owns the remaining shares in proportion to the entries in the separate sheet of co-ownership, and that the defendant F, G, H, J, K, L, L, M, M, N, P, Q, Q, D, and E (hereinafter "B") owns each of the aforementioned shares. Considering the current status of the land of this case known as the result of the on-site inspection by the court of this case, considering the plaintiff and the remaining defendants' share ratio, the part "Na" 2,509 square meters connected to each of the items in the separate sheet No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 15 of the land of this case shall be deemed to have been owned by the plaintiff and the remaining defendants' share of the same 8,9,10,11,12,13,14, and 15.
It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.