If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in the operation of the airport-free bus B.

On November 21, 2019, the Defendant driving a bus around 08:41, and driving three-lanes in front of Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, along the three-lanes in the direction of the off-road intersection from the Guro-gu Office.

At the time, there was a crosswalk with signal apparatus installed on the front door, so in such a case, there was a duty of care to check whether there is a person who gets on a road by reducing the speed and by checking well the right and the right and the right of the driver of the motor vehicle, and to safely drive the motor vehicle in accordance with the signals.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected to enter the front side of the Defendant’s vehicle and followed by the negligence of entering the front side and going through the yellow scam, and received the victim D (the age of 27) who opened the crosswalk from the right side of the Defendant’s running side to the left side of the crosswalk pursuant to the Madar New.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as an internal and floor cutting the body of the victim, for about eight weeks of medical treatment due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the following cases: A traffic accident report (1) on the occurrence of traffic accidents in the preparation of the defendant's legal statement D; (2) the closure of CCTV for crime prevention:

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 and 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning Criminal Facts, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the provisional payment order is that the defendant, while operating an airport bus, has shocked pedestrians who walked on the crosswalk in violation of the signal, and the responsibility for the crime is heavy in that the victim suffered a serious injury due to the significant and significant negligence and the reason is that the victim suffered a serious injury.

However, the defendant did not have any criminal punishment since 2000, and led to the confession of the crime of this case.