beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2020.02.05 2019고단7282

특수폭행등

Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, this judgment has become final and conclusive against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Justice] On January 16, 2020, Defendant D was sentenced to one year of suspension of the execution of official duties by the Incheon District Court on January 24, 2020, and the judgment became final and conclusive on January 24, 2020. Defendant E was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint injury) on December 20, 201, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 28, 2019.

【Criminal Facts】

Defendant A and Defendant B are friendship-gu, and Co-Defendant F, G, Defendant C, Defendant D, and Defendant E are two times the NA line.

1. Defendants A and B violated the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (joint assault), and Defendant A’s special assault Defendants A were placed outside the main point of “I” located in Bupyeong-gu Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon on September 8, 2019, and Defendant A did not go beyond the victim F (ma, 20 years of age), while engaging in a dispute with the horse dispute with the victim F (ma, 20 years of age), and Defendant B took the victim’s face twice by drinking.

이후 주점 안으로 들어가서, 피고인 A은 피해자 C의 얼굴을 주먹으로 2회 때렸고, 피해자 F를 향해 위험한 물건인 의자를 1회, 테이블을 2회 집어던졌으며, 피고인 B은 피해자 C의 몸을 발로 1회 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the defendants jointly assaulted victims, and the defendant A assaulted the victims by carrying dangerous articles.

2. Defendants A and B violated the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (joint property damage, etc.) and interference with business at the time and place described in paragraph (1). Defendants A and B collected the chair, and Defendant B collected misunderstandings that contain the tablers, chairs, and other food and drinks in the above main points, such as gathering the chair, and saving the chair, and Defendant B committed mutual fighting as described in paragraph (1) and prevented customers from posing or entering, thereby making it difficult to avoid disturbance for about six hours.

Accordingly, the defendants are jointly involved in the above cafeterias, such as those who are not on repair costs.