업무방해등
A person shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than two months and for not more than four months for the remaining crimes as set forth in Article 1(g) of the judgment of the accused.
Punishment of the crime
[criminal power] On February 5, 2020, the Defendant was sentenced to 6 months of imprisonment with prison labor and 2 years of suspended execution for the crime of interference with business, etc. at the Busan District Court’s Dong Branch Branch, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on February 13, 2020.
【Criminal Facts】
1. Interference with business;
A. A. The Defendant committed the crime against the Victim B (1) around 22:00 on June 2018, 2018, the Defendant avoided disturbance for about 20 minutes, including that, within the car page operated by the victim in Busan-gun C, the Defendant was able to avoid a disturbance, such as taking a bath against the victim under the influence of alcohol.
(2) At around 11:00 on June 2019, the Defendant: (a) 11:00, the Defendant dumpeded the victim under the influence of alcohol for about 30 minutes, including, but not limited to, the victim’s “Chewing years, the same openings”; and (b) the Defendant dumped the victim to other customers who are seated on the table.
(3) At around 10:10 on August 31, 2019, the Defendant: (a) took a bath to the victim under the influence of alcohol (i.e., “Chewing years, the same year”; (b) took a bath to the other customers who are seated on the table, and (c) took a bath to them; and (d) was unable to avoid a disturbance for about 30 minutes.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's business operations three times.
B. On July 2, 2019, the Defendant committed the crime against the victim D around July 23:0, 2019, at the main point operated by the victim in Busan-gun E, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s business by avoiding disturbance for about 30 minutes, such as “the victim’s speech that he would drink and pay money,” and “the victim would not drink himself.”
C. The written indictment submitted by the victim F prosecutor is stated as K, but according to the statement of statement (No. 3) with F, the victim of the above crime is clearly stated as “F” and the contents of the written indictment are deemed to be just a clerical error.
around 23:00 on October 16, 2019, the Defendant, who committed the crime against A, expressed that he is under the influence of alcohol “Chewingly, Chewing,” while under the influence of alcohol within the scope operated by the victim located in Busan-gun G.