In response to this, the Plaintiff appealed against the foregoing dismissed portion, and this Court only decides the portion of the claim for the payment of the credit acquired from G that was dismissed as above.

2. The reasoning for the court's decision on this part of the basic facts is the same as the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, they are cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

3. Before July 28, 2014, G determined on the claim for payment of the Plaintiff’s unpaid management expenses that were transferred from G shall be paid to the Defendant (where the Plaintiff’s materials attached to the reference documents submitted after the closure of the pleadings at the first instance trial were stated as deposited on May 20, 2014) 5 Dong 222, which were equivalent to the Plaintiff’s unpaid management expenses during the period from September 27, 2007 to June 30, 2010, KRW 9,718,990, and KRW 5 Dong 233 (where the above stores were combined, hereinafter “the above commercial building”) after July 28, 2014, the Plaintiff’s unpaid management expenses corresponding to the Plaintiff’s unpaid management expenses for the period from July 28, 2014 (where the above unpaid management expenses were combined, hereinafter “the unpaid management expenses”). The Plaintiff’s unpaid management expenses incurred to the Defendant from the Plaintiff and the Defendant, which were the Defendant’s unpaid management expenses.