2. The judgment is based on the following facts: (a) the Defendant recognized all of the instant crimes; (b) the Defendant’s disposal of a vehicle in operation, etc. is favorable circumstances; (c) driving of the instant vehicle without a driver’s license; (d) the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, operated the instant vehicle without a driver’s license; and (e) the Defendant has already been punished twice for the same type of crime; and (e) the instant crime committed on June 26, 2014, with each injury requiring two victims during driving under the influence of alcohol during about 14 weeks or about 10 weeks, and committed about 4 months from the date of suspended sentence of 6 months from the date of sentenced to a two-month period of imprisonment.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, means and consequence of the crime, and various factors of sentencing indicated in the record, such as circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable. Therefore, the Defendant’s above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.