협박
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Punishment of the crime
On July 26, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 10:00 on July 26, 2018, 2018, the Defendant, “2018 High 1705”, read as follows: (b) walking the entrance door of the above subparagraph C in front of the building C in Suwon-si, Suwon-si; (c) cutting the door door door, and opened the door, and (d) opening the door, and threatened the victim D (25 years of age) in the above subparagraph C.
The defendant of "2018 High 18.1835" is a resident of "B building E", and the victim F is a resident of "C".
On July 24, 2018, at around 21:30 on July 24, 2018, the Defendant laid down the victim’s door door in front of the building C in Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, and opened a door continuously for about five minutes, “The bit of a bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch ch,” and made intimidation by taking a bath.
Summary of Evidence
"2018 High Court 1705"
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. The witness D’s legal statement [a] 2018 Go-Ma1835] 201. The witness D’s statement (a defendant asserts that the defendant did not speak, but he/she does not accept the victim’s statement since credibility is acknowledged, and there are no other circumstances to reject this differently.]
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. The police statement concerning F;
1. The defendant knew that he/she can possess a person in the recording book, but asserts that he/she is merely a temporary display of labor union and does not threaten other parties.
However, the following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, i.e., the Defendant resisted the victim on the ground of inter-floor noise, and the Defendant sought the victim’s house on the day of the instant case and expressed the victim’s bath, such as “to die,” and “to die,” etc. at the time of the instant case, but did not directly see the horses at the time of the instant case, and tried to see the victim again on the same day, and therefore, the Defendant was the victim.