However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On January 10, 2018, on the ground that the size of drawings produced by the defendant was inaccurate, the defendant in C factory in Silung City B around 14:30, on the ground that the size of drawings produced by the defendant was incorrect, and the defendant used in C factory B with the victim D (63 ). The defendant blicked with his bomb with his bomb and bomb with his bomb, and caused the victim to be used in the floor.

As a result, the defendant abused the victim and suffered bodily injury, such as the sacrificing of the trend that requires approximately eight weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense and Articles 262, 260 (1), and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act that choose to impose a penalty (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 262, 260 (1), and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 200Da3206

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the fact that the indictment is recognized, the agreement is reached, there is no record of punishment exceeding the fine for the last five years, circumstances of crimes, etc.) or more;