beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.06.20 2018고단332 (1)

공전자기록등불실기재등

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant entered the Republic of Korea on a short-term visit on February 11, 2003 with the nationality of Pakistan, entered the Republic of Korea on February 11, 2003, and worked as an employee in Company E operated by the father D of the wife C in the state of illegal stay, which is permissible in the state of illegal stay, and was forced to depart from the Republic of Pakistan on May 14, 2010.

On May 22, 2010, the Defendant and C conspired to make a disguised marriage to obtain a new entry into the Republic of Korea. On May 31, 2010, the Defendant and C reported the marriage to the court of Pakistan, and C reported the marriage to the Defendant on May 31, 2010.

On July 23, 2013, the Defendant and C gave birth to F in a de facto marital relationship with F and C, and conspired to report the birth falsely as if they were married between the Defendant and C.

C On August 16, 2013, the public service center of the I-Myeon Office located in the wife population H in the Dong-si, G prepared a false birth report by pretending that G born between C and the Defendant was a father born between C and the Defendant, and submitted to the public official in charge of the above I-Myeon Office’s name unrecognizably and submitted to the public official in charge of the above I-Myeon Office to enter the false facts into the family relation registration information system, which is a public electronic record, and around that time, the public official in charge stored and operated such false facts in the family relation registration information system as above.

Accordingly, in collusion with C, the defendant made a false report of birth to enter false facts into the family relation registration information system, which is a public electronic record, and exercised it by making it stored and operated.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The gist of the Defendant and his defense counsel’s assertion C added to G at the her single-face office, and the Defendant did not participate in or conspired with C, and the Defendant did not know of the fact that C reported the birth of G.

(b) A prosecutor 1 to determine.