except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 19:40 on March 4, 2014, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the police officer’s lawful performance of duties concerning the maintenance of order by the police officer, who was sent to the police officer upon receiving a report that the Defendant scam a scam at his house, by the police officer, G, etc., a police officer belonging to the Jeju Western Police Station, who was sent to the guard, and carried out stairs together with the police officer, and went back to G, who was called “I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, and

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement of G and H;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime: Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Suspension of execution: The sentencing guidelines for the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the sentencing conditions specified in Article 51 of the Criminal Act as stated in the reasons for sentencing) shall be imposed as the order, taking into consideration all the following circumstances (the scope of the recommended sentence for the obstruction of performance of official duties, the obstruction of performance of official duties, the first category (the obstruction of performance of official duties), the basic area: six months in prison, and one year and four months in prison, and one year and four months in prison): The favorable circumstances are against the recognition of a crime; the situation is against the recognition of a crime; the degree of violence is also a crime against a police officer in the course of performing official duties; the degree of violence is not easy; the degree of violence is also a crime against a police officer in the course of official duties; three years in prison was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for the crime of assault in 195; the fact that there was three times in prison punishment due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act by not later than 2012: The age,