2. The defendant recognized his mistake from the investigation stage to reflect himself, and there are no circumstances to consider such as hearing father's death consciousness during detention.

However, the Defendant had been punished several times for the same crime, and the Defendant committed each of the crimes of this case repeatedly from the time when the Defendant had served for and released from the same crime. It was not only a large amount of damage caused by the crime of this case, but also did not receive an accusation from the victims.

In full view of the equity with cases of the same kind of crime, the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, intelligence and environment, the background leading to the instant crime, the means and methods of committing the crime, and the circumstances after committing the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion is not acceptable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.