except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 03:20 on July 23, 2015, the Defendant: (a) found the victim C in Gumi-si B with E and the preceding game room operated by the Defendant; (b) found E and damaged the above entrance by putting cement bricks, which is a dangerous object in the influence stairs, in spite of the fact that the Defendant was influenced, and was influenced with e and damaged by getting a part of the above entrance door by 150,00 won at the wooden entrance of KRW 303,00,000, the victim owned.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (D business owners' statements on excursion ships);

1. Article 369 (1) or 366 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Articles 369 (1) or 366 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act suspended execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) that acknowledges the crime of this case and reflects his mistake, that the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant, that the defendant seems to have caused contingent crimes under the influence of alcohol, and that the defendant's age, criminal records, character and conduct, environment, health conditions, etc. are considered);