However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On July 21, 2013, around 22:25, 2013, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender from the victim F, a police official belonging to the Seoul Geumcheon Police Station Estation, who received 112 report, to G, and was dispatched to the Republic of Korea, due to an assault to exchange from the victim F, who was a police official belonging to the Seoul Geumcheon Police Station Estation, and was in the process, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender. On the other hand, the Defendant took an investigation into the victim, “humping, humping, humping, humping, and gye., humping.”, “hump, hye, hye, to the police station,” and “Who hye, tobacco gye,” and insulting the victim by openly insulting the victim.

2. At around 22:50 on July 21, 2013, the Defendant expressed that “I, a police officer belonging to the Efers, who confirmed his/her personal information, takes the bath to “I, she is in her own knife, she is in her own knife, she is in her own knife,” and assaulted the victim’s back knife part on one occasion of walking, and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the handling of the instant case.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of each Act and subordinate statute to the police statement of G, F, and I;

1. Article 136 (1) or 311 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes. Article 136 (Selection of Imprisonment)

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Determination as to the rejection of prosecution in accordance with Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Do1448, Apr.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that at around 22:20 on July 21, 2013, the Defendant expressed the victim G (the age of 49) who arrived at the scene of the Defendant’s vehicle in Geumcheon-gu Seoul for the purpose of acting on behalf of the Defendant to promptly open a passenger car door to the Defendant. The Defendant expressed the victim’s desire to “Is the victim’s right part of the victim’s right part of the drinking water,” “Is the victim’s right part of the drinking water,” and walk the victim’s part of the vessel one time, and continued to damage the Defendant.