A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 1,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Defendant

A and B, respectively.

Defendant

A served as the chairperson of the building management unit of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building from

A parking lot shall not be used for any purpose other than a parking lot, and a person responsible for the management of an attached parking lot shall maintain the original function of the attached parking lot so that the owner of the facility or the user of the attached parking lot may not interfere with the use of the attached parking lot.

Nevertheless, Defendant A and Defendant B conspired with the above E on November 28, 2013 to hold an ordinary general meeting of the E-building on the fifth floor and to change the purpose of use, such as moving the management office located on the second floor to the parking lot annexed to the first floor, and constructed a building on the parking lot annexed to the first floor from around that time to use the attached parking lot for the purpose other than the parking lot. Defendant A and Defendant B did not maintain the original function of the attached parking lot without justifiable grounds by either closing down the parking lot attached to the first floor, by installing a portable group on the parking lot attached to the fifth floor, and by leaving the occupants to store goods. From March 12, 2014 to the attached parking lot attached to the building first floor, Defendant C did not maintain the original function of the attached parking lot without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each legal statement of witness F and G;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. A written accusation;

1. Investigation reports (business reports on dispatch and management of evidence of contents), investigation reports (Submission of statement and examination records of witnesses), and investigation reports (reports on confirmation of non-performance by police officers in charge of reinstatement to the original state);

1. The Act and subordinate statutes governing the investigation report (Submission of photographs);