beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2014.12.15 2014고단348

사기등

Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of 8 months, Defendant B's imprisonment of 6 months, Defendant C's fine of 3 million won, and Defendant D.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

D On January 11, 2013, the Suwon District Court was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud and two years of suspended execution, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on September 27, 2013.

In addition, on November 8, 2013, Defendant E was sentenced to a two-year suspended sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. at the Sungnam branch of the Suwon District Court on June 8, 2013, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on October 3, 2014. On April 1, 2014, Defendant E was sentenced to a two-year suspended sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for six months in the same court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on September 30, 2014.

Defendant A and Defendant D are those who operate “G multilateral bank” located in the Gyeonggi Pyeong-gu Group F as a partnership business, Defendant B is the husband of Defendant A, and Defendant C is an employee from the above “G multilateral bank.”

1. Defendants A and D co-principal Defendants conspired to forge the real estate lease agreement in the above G multilateral bank and to use money as a prepaid payment for female employees working in the above multilateral bank by lending money as security. A.

On September 2, 2013, the Defendants forged private documents using the official approval color pen to enter KRW 1,50,000 in the area of real estate lease agreement in the area of the real estate lease agreement, the amount of KRW 1,50,000,000,000 in PH, resident registration number, address, and telephone number, and then affix H seal prepared in advance by H name.

As a result, the Defendants forged one copy of the real estate lease agreement in the name of H, a private document on rights and duties without authority for the purpose of exercising their rights in collusion.

B. At the time indicated in paragraph (1), the Defendants conspired to offer a copy of the forged real estate lease agreement to I, a lender, who is aware of the forgery at the coffee shop in the above G multilateral case, at the same time.

C. The Defendants conspired to commit fraud at the time, time, and place described in the paragraph (a). Defendant D, the lessor of the said G multilateral bank, and Defendant A, the lessee of the said G multilateral bank.