A Imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and for six months, respectively.

However, for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendants appear to be the victim’s “F” of the facts charged against the Victim D in the Gyeong-si, North America, as it appears to be the clerical error of the “D”. As such, the Defendants are visitors to the “E” operated by the Defendant.

1. 피고인들의 공동 범행 피고인들은 2020. 5. 5. 00:25 경 위 E에서 술값 문제로 피해자와 말다툼을 하던 중 피고인 A은 피해자에게 건넨 자신의 신용카드가 바닥에 떨어지자 “ 야, 이 씨 발, 내 카드 어디 있냐고, 개새끼들 아 ”라고 욕설을 하며 소리를 지르고, 피고인 B은 “ 내가 뭘 그랬는데 씨발 년 아 ”라고 욕설을 하는 등 약 1시간 동안 소란을 피웠다.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the E-management of the victim by force.

2. The sole criminal conduct of Defendant A;

A. At around 01:30 on May 5, 2020, the Defendant, at the same place as the victim’s 112 report and received a request from the police officer G, and the police officer to leave from the air conditioning, she expressed the police officer’s desire to read the police officer “at the end of 10:0, 100 to the end of 1:0, 200, she took a bath to read the police officer “at the end of 1:0, 200, she was able to do so,” and the police officer tried to remove the police officer from the air conditioning and she she she she she she she she with a desire to she she with her to remove the main disease.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reports.

B. Defendant who damaged public goods was arrested as a current offender, such as interference with the performance of official duties as stipulated in paragraph 2(a), and was transferred to the police box located in Gyeong-si, Gyeong-si, Gyeong-si, Gyeong-si, Gyeong-si, on May 5, 2020, and was installed at around 02:20 on the ground that he did not unfilled himself.

Around 101,00 won, the air conditioner was damaged to be repaired in a number of times.

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged the goods used by public offices.

3. The defendant B’s sole crime is as set forth in paragraph 2(a).