A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and four months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment of three years and six months, respectively.

No. 9,10,19,20 of seized evidence.

[Criminal Justice] On October 31, 2013, Defendant B was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny at the Seoul East Eastern District Court on February 19, 2014, and the execution of the sentence was terminated on January 27, 201, and the Seoul High Court sentenced one year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny, etc. and completed the execution of the sentence on September 27, 201.

【Criminal Facts】

Defendant

A receives the proposal for larceny from Defendant B and E to reflect the profits earned by the future criminal act, and Defendants and E purchased from the iron shop the date draber, wall (not leaving the door), niter, etc. which are necessary for the criminal act, and return to the apartment complex, etc. that can be seen as well as the apartment complex, etc. that can be seen to be living externally. However, in the case where there is no early marcing from the victim’s residence, the first race was divided into the victim’s dwelling, and there is no rupture, the Defendant A performs the role of helping or facilitating the process of opening by destroying the corrective device near the elevator, or by destroying the corrective device near the date prepared in advance, and Defendant B and E have opened the corrective device with the date prepared in advance by Defendant B and E, or offered money and valuables by impairing the victim’s residence through the front door open by Defendant A.

1. On July 3, 2014, from around 12:55 to around 13:19 of the same day, the Defendants divided the first race and confirmed that there was no seal on the part of the Defendant at the “H apartment” in which the victim G located in Seongbuk-gu Seoul is residing in Seongbuk-gu, Seoul. Defendant A would be aware of the network by allowing the Defendant to inform the Defendant of the elevator location if any leakage group comes from the elevator location, and Defendant B would have the process of opening the corrective device. Defendant B would have scam the corrective device. Defendant B would have scam the corrective device in advance. Defendant B would have scam back the above corridor by means of a date Draber, etc. prepared for the small-scale escape of the corridor at the above residence, and then intrudeed the house inside the residence, and followed the inside, and then 3,170,000 won worth 1,160,000 won per half of the 50,000 won owned by the victim.