If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

The defendant is an agricultural day in the above residential area, and the victim C (the age of 65) and the victim D (the age of 58, the female) live in the same village as the defendant is living between husband and wife.

Around 1:00 on September 1, 2012, the Defendant: (a) held a village general meeting in front of the Seosan-gun E Village Community Center; and (b) even though there was no fact that the victim C embezzled the agricultural company subsidies, the Defendant had damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts by openly pointing out false facts to the victim’s answer to six lots of land, such as the orchard located in the 2011-F, the Namnam-gun, the Defendant cultivated, and receiving KRW 330,00,00, and embling the subsidies.

Around 11:00 on September 1, 2012, the Defendant damaged the honor of the victim by publicly pointing out false facts by openly pointing out them out, while hearing 15 community residents from the Masan angle to the E Village Community Center by 15 community residents.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to C, D, G, and H

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;