However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On September 20, 2013, around 17:30, the Defendant: (a) committed assault against the victim C, who was an employee of the said store, in the course of ordering the hambation to the victim C (the 18-year old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-gu “E”), and (b) committed an act of assaulting the victim, i.e., the victim’s breath by drinking breath; (c) the victim’s breath, and caused the victim to face with the carbage, thereby causing approximately two weeks of treatment; and (d) the victim committed an act of assaulting the victim, such as the breath’s bat and tension.

2. The Defendant injured the Victim F, who had reported that he was dissatisfied with C at the same time and place as described in paragraph 1, saw the victim F (the age of 30) who was the customer, to see the horses that he would be boomed from the victim F (the age of 30). By hand, he saw the victim's face on a hand several occasions by saving fating fat of the victim's fat, and continuously reported 112, and put the victim's face on the face of the police officer dispatched to the site after receiving a report on 112, and requested the victim to take out tobacco at the right place, and put the victim's left part on the victim's unfating image of the treatment days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Each written statement of G and C;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of each statute on photographs of damage;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act selecting a penalty;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc., even though the Defendant had been punished several times, the crime of this case was committed, and the nature of the crime was bad and the Defendant did not endeavor to recover from damage. Therefore, the Defendant should be punished strictly.

However, the fact that the defendant is against himself and the defendant.