beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2016.10.19 2016고단1081

공기호위조등

Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months;

2.Provided, That the execution of the above imprisonment for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 23, 2015, the Defendant, who violated the Automobile Management Act, committed a forged number plate in front of the front part of the B-owned Crlurler Cratus Cratus CIFIC car (PACIFIC), which was driven by the Defendant of Pyeongtaek on November 23, 2015, was kept in custody in the transportation administration of the Suwon-gu Office as a result of tax delinquency, and the Defendant was able to make a forged number plate in lieu of the registration number plate.

On December 2, 2015, the Defendant, without authority, entered “C” by using a computer at his office located in Suwon-gu, Busan, without authority, for the purpose of exercising patrol force, and printed out a white paper A3 paper, forged one registration number plate by printing it, and, on the same day, operated the forged registration number plate back to the front page of the said car as if it was actually issued a genuine registration number plate, and used the forged registration number plate by driving it back to two sides tape.

Accordingly, the defendant forged a motor vehicle registration number plate which is an air defenseer, exercised a forged registration number plate, and at the same time forged and used a registration number plate under the Motor Vehicle Management Act.

2. Any person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall not operate a motor vehicle on the road which is not covered by mandatory insurance, and the defendant is a person holding a motor vehicle of Czeraslus CPA (PACIFIC).

Nevertheless, around 14:54 on May 28, 2015, the Defendant operated the said car on the intersection located in the Manduk-dong, Busan, and around 14:43 on August 26, 2015, the Defendant operated the said car at the Seodung-dong, Nam-gu, Busan, which was not covered by mandatory insurance twice in total.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. Statement of E;

1. Reports on internal insurance (limited to details of subscription to and register of automobiles of mandatory insurance);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on site photographs.