However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 02:10 on October 26, 2019, the Defendant: (a) 02:0 on the D cafeteria managed by the members of Ansan-si, the Defendant, while drinking in the D cafeteria and drinking in the table, had female customers, who had other the table, face without any justifiable reason; (b) continued to have other customers, “I am slick, I am Slick, I am Slick, I am Slick,” and (c) asked the victim, who asked for early sailing, to take a bath for about 50 minutes, such as “I am governance, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, and I am,” and interfere with the victim’s restaurant business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal offenders, report on internal investigation and investigation (victim C telephone conversations), investigation report (person for reference E telephone conversations), investigation report (F telephone conversations of a police officer for the same police officer) and investigation report (F telephone conversations of a police

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on Probation and Order to Attend Courses;