A. Defendant B’s KRW 2 million and for this, 5% per annum from March 31, 2015 to June 7, 2017.

A. The Plaintiff’s basic facts are the Plaintiff’s agreement on the supply of 25,000 dubs to Defendant B, as marked on November 17, 2014 (hereinafter “instant agreement”), and the agreement on the supply of sawbs (hereinafter “instant agreement”). The fact that the unit price per 1 dubs for the five dubs is 1,400 does not conflict among the parties.

B. On November 17, 2014, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with Defendant B to supply mushroom 25,000 tons. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff entered into a contract to supply KRW 30,000 with the warden, but it appears that the Plaintiff’s assertion was withdrawn in the complaint as above. The Plaintiff supplied KRW 20,000 to Defendant B on March 28, 2015 under the above contract, and KRW 5,000 remains, but the Plaintiff supplied KRW 20,000 with the remainder of KRW 5,00 with the order of KRW 5,00 as well as the above KRW 5,00 with the order of KRW 20,00 with the order of KRW 60 with the remainder of KRW 30,00 with the order of KRW 40,00 with the remainder of KRW 60 with the order of KRW 300,00 with the above order of KRW 5,00.

Although it was true that Defendant B prepared the instant agreement with the Plaintiff, for the portion of 15,000 salary supply, Defendant B is actually a contracting party for the portion of 10,000 salary supply, E is a contractual party, and for convenience, the agreement is prepared in the name of the Defendant, and is null and void as it constitutes false declaration of conspiracy for the portion of supply E.

Since then, the defendant B.